The home of the usb.ids
file
Main -> USB Device Classes -> Device class 08 -> Device subclass 08:06 -> Program interface 08:06:62
Name: USB Attached SCSI
http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/Mass_Storage_Specification_Overview_v1.4_2-19-2010.pdf (table 2)
I also personally have a device that supports UAS.
2013-05-07 03:03:16
Name: UAS
Specification document now found at https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/Mass_Storage_Specification_Overview_v1.4_2-19-2010.pdf .
For UAS-capable USB-SATA bridges, "lsusb -v" shows "Bulk-Only" as a description for the "bInterfaceProtocol 80" line, but no similar description for the "bInterfaceProtocol 98" line. Since UAS bridges are pretty common these days, it seems like the both interfaces should included in usb.ids ....
2019-08-21 21:04:59
Name: USB Attached SCSI
This is UAS Protocol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_Attached_SCSI.
Already recognized in Kernel https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.15/source/include/linux/usb/storage.h#L35
Protocol documentation: https://usb.org/document-library/usb-attached-scsi-protocol-uasp-v10-and-adopters-agreement
2021-11-08 17:09:24
Any reason why this has not been accepted?
2023-11-17 22:58:12
Name: UASP
Note: USB Attached SCSI Protocol
The name is picked from an official specification at https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/Mass_Storage_Specification_Overview_v1.4_2-19-2010.pdf
Currently if you check the output of "lsusb -v" for an usb drive which support program interface 08:06:62, there is no name for the protocol yet.
Since now USB Attached SCSI Protocol(UASP) is commonly used by more and more usb drives, we should speed up the acceptance of a proper name for it.
2024-01-12 05:44:38