Name: CP210x UART Bridge
2019-10-24 05:52:31
The home of the usb.ids
file
Main -> USB Devices -> Device UD:10c4 -> Subsystem UD:10c4:ea60
Name: CP210x UART Bridge
Name: CP210x Composite Device
2009-06-28 19:03:11
Name: CP210x USB to UART Bridge
2012-02-29 15:56:34
Name: myAVR mySmartUSB light
The following product actually uses this USB-UART chip: mySmartUSB light
http://shop.myavr.com/index.php?sp=article.sp.php&artID=200006
It's a cheap AVR ISP programmer
2012-03-28 20:59:02
Name: CP210x UART Bridge / myAVR mySmartUSB light
2012-04-11 10:56:10
Name: CP210x UART Bridge / myAVR mySmartUSB light / QStarz GPS logger
USB to serial interface of at least QStarz BT-Q1000 and BT-Q1200U GPS logger (and maybe more their models) use this USB id as well.
BT-Q1000P: I just verified with my device.
BT-Q1200U: http://www.abclinuxu.cz/hardware/vstupni-zarizeni/gps/qstarz-bt-q1200u
QStarz BT-Q1000XT probably uses 0e8d:3329 https://chromium.googlesource.com/experimental/chromium/src/+/refs/wip/bajones/webvr/third_party/usb_ids/usb.ids?autodive=0%2F
2016-01-11 16:08:50
Name: CP2102/CP2109 USB to UART Bridge Controller [CP210x family]
A lot of suggested names overlay "device this chip is installed in", anywhere the implementer has elected not to register (and program) an alternate idVendor:idProduct pair.
0x10c4:0xea60 is officially two devices, which differ in their iProduct string:
CP2102 Product Description String -- "CP2102 USB to UART Bridge Controller"
CP2109 Product Description String -- "CP2109 USB to UART Bridge Controller"
http://www.silabs.com/Support%20Documents/TechnicalDocs/CP2102-9.pdf
See section 8 referencing that pair, as well as mentioning (__emphasis__ added):
"While customization of the USB configuration data is optional, it is __recommended__ to customize the VID/PID
combination...."
2017-01-29 23:55:05
Name: CP2102/CP2109 UART Bridge Controller [CP210x family]
2017-06-22 19:15:22
Name: CP210x UART Bridge
I work at Silicon Labs. There are several compatible parts that use this PID. It would be awkward to list all in the description and we prefer CP210x UART Bridge. Also, this should not be overloaded with other product names that happen to use the CP210x and don't bother to change the PID. If custom branding is desired then those vendors should use a different PID.
2017-09-27 20:05:29
Name: CP210x USB to UART Bridge
2019-04-01 07:45:21
Name: CP210x USB to UART Bridge
2019-04-01 21:45:19
Name: CP210x UART Bridge
2019-10-24 05:52:31
Id | Name | Note |
---|